Requester Name Incorrect | Community
Skip to main content

Requester Name Incorrect

  • March 14, 2018
  • 14 replies
  • 0 views

Lone

When someone emails in a support ticket, the requester name is often the first portion of their email address (ie. everything before the @ symbol).  Why isn't the person's actual name used when available in the "From:" field?

This topic has been closed for replies.

14 replies

Abdul12
  • March 14, 2018

Hi Lone

I am pretty sure that Zendesk extracts the name correctly, and uses it. There must be wrong in your case. Does it happen with all tickets?

Can you share raw (obfuscate -- to hide sensitive data) email source? You can find that by chooses events (instead of conversations) in ticket-view (just above comment list).

Thank you

Cheers

-abdul

--

Abdul Qabiz
diziana  •  twitter  •  linkedin  •  blog

Team Diziana

Diziana is creator of awesome ready-to-go Zendesk Help Center Themes, and has helped hundreds of organizations/companies with Help Center Branding and Customization.


Lone
  • Author
  • March 14, 2018

Return-Path: <loneprairie@ps385941.dreamhostps.com>
X-Original-To: support@loneprairiecamp.zendesk.com
Delivered-To: support@loneprairiecamp.zendesk.com
Envelope-From: loneprairie@ps385941.dreamhostps.com
Received: from in4.pod13.usw2.zdsys.com (unknown [10.210.69.117])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by work10.pod13.usw2.zdsys.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60BDC83420
for <support@loneprairiecamp.zendesk.com>; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 20:08:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by in4.pod13.usw2.zdsys.com (Postfix, from userid 65534)
id 5CAD6CBFDA; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 20:08:37 +0000 (UTC)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
in4.pod13.usw2.zdsys.com
X-Spam-Level: ****
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,TO_NO_BRKTS_HTML_ONLY
autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0
X-Spam-Zendesk-Score: 4.8
X-Spam-Zendesk-Report:
* 0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is
* CUSTOM_MED
* 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
* (test[at]gmail.com)
* 0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail
* domains are different
* 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts
* 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
* 0.2 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and
* EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different
* 1.2 NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED ADSP custom_med hit, and not from a mailing list
* 2.0 TO_NO_BRKTS_HTML_ONLY To: lacks brackets and HTML only
Envelope-From: loneprairie@ps385941.dreamhostps.com
Received: from ps385941.dreamhostps.com (ps385941.dreamhost.com [173.236.244.28])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by in4.pod13.usw2.zdsys.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2796C3277
for <support@loneprairiecamp.zendesk.com>; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 20:08:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ps385941.dreamhostps.com (Postfix, from userid 14832625)
id B15851E03338F0; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 13:08:35 -0700 (PDT)
To: support@loneprairiecamp.zendesk.com
Subject: New submission from LPC Email Subscription - 2440
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 14832625:class-phpmailer.php
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 20:08:35 +0000
From: FTest LTest <test@gmail.com>
Reply-To: test@gmail.com
Message-ID: <e4771de9f2a2ba204f7ee11bd0e6319d@loneprairiecamp.com>
X-Mailer: WPMailSMTP/Mailer/mail 1.2.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
X-CMAE-Score: 0
X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=QPVGuDDL c=1 sm=1 tr=0
a=31fvnZjTyJ9Wfy+wnK04mg==:117 a=31fvnZjTyJ9Wfy+wnK04mg==:17
a=U7BXlWGA7_0A:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=x7bEGLp0ZPQA:10 a=hMMN486TSD4A:10
a=65Lj2kn8Lx8A:10 a=v2DPQv5-lfwA:10 a=zd9AlV35c75j4I9IwtUA:9
a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=mXfRtrXoCqknWgssAtGR:22

<html>
<head>
<title>New submission from LPC Email Subscription - 2440</title>
</head>
<body>
<strong>Name:</strong> FTest LTest<br>
<br>
<strong>Any specific interests and/or questions?</strong> Testing<br>
<br>
<strong>I would like to subscribe to:</strong> Newsletter Updates (~Monthly)<br>
<strong>I would like to unsubscribe from:</strong>
</body>
</html>

 


Lone
  • Author
  • March 16, 2018

I'd really appreciate some assistance figuring out this issue. As you can see, the name is included in the bolded "From:" field ("FTest LTest"), but the Requester name listed in ZenDesk is "Test" (ie. the first portion of the email address).


Lone
  • Author
  • March 19, 2018

Does the blank name in the "Reply-To" field override the name in the "From" field?  I think that is the issue.


  • March 22, 2018

Hey Lone Prairie! Sorry for the delayed response!

We have a Support Tip that explains how to pull that information in. You can find it here.


Lone
  • Author
  • March 24, 2018

@jessie , That article is helpful in that it confirms that ZenDesk takes the name from the "From:" field when possible.  However, it doesn't explain why that isn't working my case.  Does the blank name in the "Reply-To" field override the name in the "From" field?


Gail12
  • April 1, 2018

Hi Lone Prairie, 

I'm Gail from the Support team and I'd like to pull this question into a ticket so we can look at some account specific information. You will be receiving an email about that shortly! 

 

 


Lone
  • Author
  • April 10, 2018

So the Requester name is generated from the "Reply-to" field (if present) as I surmised - Thank you ZenDesk for confirming that.

It is my understanding that the RFC for email does not allow anything but an email address in the "Reply-To" field (ie. one can't add a name in a "Reply-To" field).  If so, couldn't/shouldn't the ZenDesk system check whether the email address matches the "From:" field and then use the name from there?


Nicole17
  • April 11, 2018

HI Lone Prairie - 

Did this get answered in the ticket you had with Gail, or is do you still have this question? 


Lone
  • Author
  • April 11, 2018

I was directed to create a suggestion since the current implementation is less than ideal: https://support.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/community/posts/360001094407-Requester-Name-When-Reply-To-Field-isn-t-Blank


Nicole17
  • April 11, 2018

ah, okay. Thanks for doing that!


Lone
  • Author
  • November 1, 2018

Where did my suggestion go?  The link above doesn't seem to work anymore...


Nicole17
  • November 2, 2018

Hey Lone Prairie Camp -

Sorry about that! It looks like it was erroneously moved into the archive. It should be live again now.


  • January 9, 2019

Hi Doug,
If you're using a form on your website or a third party form submitted through the email channel, your Zendesk doesn't have chance to grab the user information. You can remedy this by connecting your form via the Zendesk API channel.

There is a great step-by-step guide for using the api channel for a form in a document called: Building a custom ticket form with the Zendesk API

Ben Koehler
Customer Advocate
bkoehler@zendesk.com