Need a placeholder for satisfaction reason | Community
Skip to main content
Parked

Need a placeholder for satisfaction reason

Related products:Ticketing system (Support)
  • August 17, 2016
  • 37 replies
  • 0 views

Show first post

37 replies

Portal
  • December 15, 2022

+1


Marjana11
  • February 23, 2023

+1


  • July 10, 2023

Following up on this. It looks like the product team had last updated in 2022. Not sure if this had made the roadmap for 2023?

Like many others, we are able to use the satisfaction reasons within triggers to notify our leadership teams--but not fully able to provide a quick, full snapshot of the CSAT. Having the ability to have a native placeholder {{satisfaction.reason}} would allow less swivel time for our leaders, quicker coaching for our support teams, and a faster resolution should a customer not be satisfied.


Almog11
  • November 15, 2023

Same use case for me too


  • April 19, 2024

Vote from us. We use satisfaction placeholders for our Slack notifications and satisfaction reason is one required


Almog11
  • August 29, 2024

Hey, ZD team, it's been more than two years since your last “official” announcement about this feature.
Can you share when it will be released (as part of your roadmap)? 


Marc36
  • November 14, 2024

Same here! +1


Nora11
  • April 28, 2025

+1


Nora11
  • April 28, 2025

Actually, if you are on Legacy CSATS (not with the rating scale) you can use this: satisfaction.current_comment


+1

 


Mikkel15
  • December 3, 2025

I find this here at the end of 2025, and this request is soon gonna celebrate it's 10 year anniversary.

 

I would very much like this feature 🙂


Anastasiia13

Hi! Are there any updates on this? It's quite unusual that we're unable to use the default CSAT survey results in our workflow. Please look into this matter.